Talmud zoology fact-check: claims 1–20
20 zoological assertions of the Babylonian Talmud, chosen from the parts of Lewysohn, Die Zoologie des Talmuds (1858), that are already in English (lewysohn-zoologie: pp. 1–158). Each is checked against current zoology, and Lewysohn's own 1858 judgement is checked too.
Talmud text: Sefaria public export (gs://sefaria-export, export of 2026-11-01), William Davidson edition (Aramaic and English), CC BY-NC. Citations link to Bekiut, which uses the same daf and segment numbers. § links go to the English reading edition of Lewysohn. Last built 01-Nov-2026.
True / mostly true: 8Partly true: 3False / mostly false: 9
Summary
| # | Talmud claim | Citation (links to Bekiut) | Lewysohn (1858) | Verdict based on modern science |
| 1 | Bat: lays eggs, yet suckles | Bekhorot 7b:20 | § 16: Right: bats do not lay eggs | Partly true |
| 2 | Cat gestation: 52 days | Bekhorot 8a:12 | § 17: Calls it inexact; his own 55 d is also too short | False (too short) |
| 3 | Pig gestation: 60 days | Bekhorot 8a:12 | § 17: Missed the error | False |
| 4 | Large predators, elephant, apes: 3 years | Bekhorot 8a:13 | § 17: Right: erroneous, from Aristotle | False |
| 5 | Livestock: 5, 9 and 12 months | Bekhorot 8a:13 | § 17: Right on livestock; wrong to reject the camel's 12 months | True |
| 6 | No upper front teeth = ruminant with cloven hooves | Chullin 59a:8–11 | § 58: Accepts it | True (within livestock) |
| 7 | Hare (and hyrax) chew the cud | Chullin 59a:10 | § 141: Wrong: says hares ruminate | Partly true |
| 8 | Male hyena becomes a bat after 7 years | Bava Kamma 16a:22 | § 119: Right: a fable; explains it via the hyena's anal pouch | False |
| 9 | The ishut (mole) has no eyes | Moed Katan 6b:14 | § 135: Right: Syrian mole, eyes under the skin | True |
| 10 | Telling mule from hinny | Chullin 79a:11 | § 168: Repeats it without comment | Mostly false |
| 11 | Hen: 21 days | Bekhorot 8a:12 | § 17: Right: means hatching, not egg formation | True |
| 12 | Fox and "all sheratzim": 6 months | Bekhorot 8a:12 | § 120: Repeats it | False |
| 13 | Snake 7 years, viper 70 years | Bekhorot 8a:14 | § 17: Right: false | False |
| 14 | Mates by night, births by night (bat); by day (hen) | Beitzah 7a:15 | § 16: Accepts it | Mostly false |
| 15 | Signs of a rabid dog | Yoma 83b:18 | § 122: Repeats it; wrong cause for the open mouth | Mostly true |
| 16 | Food stays in a dog's gut 3 days | Shabbat 155b:11 | § 122: Repeats it; his citation is wrong | Mostly false |
| 17 | The cat covers its excrement | Eruvin 100b:29 | § 118: Accepts it; adds Pliny's reason | True |
| 18 | Goats lead; camel's short tail; ox's long tail | Shabbat 77b:8 | § 52: Accepts it | Mostly true |
| 19 | The hen's lower eyelid closes upward | Shabbat 77b:9 | § 46: Right; widens it to other birds | True |
| 20 | Fish, snake and pig get stronger with age | Shabbat 77b:11 | § 41: Repeats it | Partly true |
Claims
1 Bat: lays eggs, yet suckles Partly true
Bekhorot 7b:20 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן דג טמא משריץ דג טהור מטיל ביצים כל המוליד מניק וכל המטיל ביצים מלקט חוץ מעטלף שאף על פי שמטיל ביצים מניק
§ The Gemara cites the entirety of the previously mentioned baraita. The Sages taught that a non-kosher fish spawns its offspring, while a kosher fish lays eggs. Any animal that gives birth to its offspring nurses them, and any animal that lays eggs gathers food and feeds it to its young. This applies to all animals except for a bat [atallef ], as although it lays eggs, it nurses its young.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Every animal that bears live young suckles them; every egg-layer gathers food for its young; the exception is the bat, which lays eggs and yet suckles.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 16 · §§ 16 and 136 (pp. 9, 104): calls the egg-laying claim false and "striking"; says the Talmud followed Scripture, which lists the bat among birds. He also limits the first half: some insects and the viper bear live young but do not suckle.
- Current zoology
- All bats (order Chiroptera, about 1,400 species) are placental mammals. They are viviparous and suckle with mammary glands. No bat lays eggs. The only egg-laying mammals are the monotremes (platypus, echidnas), which also produce milk. The rule "live-bearer suckles" is also false outside mammals: many sharks, snakes (vipers) and some insects bear live young without milk.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Partly true. Suckling: true. Egg-laying: false. Lewysohn's correction is right.
2 Cat gestation: 52 days False (too short)
Bekhorot 8a:12 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן תרנגולת לעשרים ואחד יום וכנגדה באילן לוז כלב לחמשים יום וכנגדו באילן תאינה חתול לחמשים ושנים יום וכנגדו באילן תות חזיר לששים יום כנגדו באילן תפוח שועל וכל מיני שרצים ששה חדשים וכנגדם באילן תבואה
§ The Gemara cites a baraita that discusses the length of gestation for various animals. The Sages taught that a chicken hatches after twenty-one days, and corresponding to it in length of gestation with regard to trees is the almond, which ripens twenty-one days after the budding of the flower. A dog gives birth after fifty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the fig. A cat gives birth after fifty-two days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the mulberry. A pig gives birth after sixty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the apple. A fox and all types of creeping animals give birth after six months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees, i.e., plants, is grain.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- A cat gives birth after 52 days (in the same list: a dog after 50 days).
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · §§ 17, 118 (pp. 10, 75–76): "inexact", because the cat carries 55 days (Voigt); at § 118 he calls 52 days "fairly accurate".
- Current zoology
- Domestic cat gestation averages about 65 days (studies: 65.1 d in 1,056 UK pedigree litters; 65.3 d, range 57–72; 66.9 d in a research colony). 52 days is at the extreme low edge of reported ranges and is about 13 days short of the mean. The dog figure (50 days) is also short: dogs average about 63 days from ovulation (roughly 57–72 days from mating).
- Verdict based on modern science
- False (too short). Off by about 20%. Lewysohn's 55 days (from Voigt, 1835–40) is also too short.
3 Pig gestation: 60 days False
Bekhorot 8a:12 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן תרנגולת לעשרים ואחד יום וכנגדה באילן לוז כלב לחמשים יום וכנגדו באילן תאינה חתול לחמשים ושנים יום וכנגדו באילן תות חזיר לששים יום כנגדו באילן תפוח שועל וכל מיני שרצים ששה חדשים וכנגדם באילן תבואה
§ The Gemara cites a baraita that discusses the length of gestation for various animals. The Sages taught that a chicken hatches after twenty-one days, and corresponding to it in length of gestation with regard to trees is the almond, which ripens twenty-one days after the budding of the flower. A dog gives birth after fifty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the fig. A cat gives birth after fifty-two days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the mulberry. A pig gives birth after sixty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the apple. A fox and all types of creeping animals give birth after six months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees, i.e., plants, is grain.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- A pig gives birth after 60 days.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · §§ 17, 170 (pp. 10, 147): repeats the figure; no correction.
- Current zoology
- Domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) gestation is about 114 days (the farmers' rule "3 months, 3 weeks, 3 days"); large commercial herds now average up to about 117 days.
- Verdict based on modern science
- False. Almost half the real length. Lewysohn missed the error.
4 Large predators, elephant, apes: 3 years False
Bekhorot 8a:13 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
בהמה דקה טהורה לחמשה חדשים וכנגדן באילן גפן בהמה גסה טמאה לשנים עשר חודש וכנגדו באילן דקל טהורה לתשעה חדשים וכנגדה באילן זית הזאב והארי והדוב והנמר והברדלס והפיל והקוף והקיפוף לשלש שנים וכנגדן באילן בנות שוח
Small kosher livestock, such as sheep or goats, give birth after five months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the grapevine. Large non-kosher livestock, such as camels or donkeys, give birth after twelve months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the date palm. Large kosher livestock, such as cows, give birth after nine months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the olive. The wolf, and the lion, and the bear, and the leopard, and the bardelas, and the elephant, and the monkey, and the long-tailed ape give birth after three years, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the white fig.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The wolf, lion, bear, leopard, bardelas (hyena?), elephant, monkey and kipof (long-tailed ape) give birth after three years.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · § 17 (pp. 10–11) and at each animal: "erroneous"; traces the figure to Aristotle (elephant 18 months to 3 years) and to popular belief, because these animals' mating is rarely seen.
- Current zoology
- Wolf about 63 days; lion about 108–110 days; leopard about 90–105 days; brown bear about 7 months from mating, because the embryo rests for 4–5 months before implantation (active gestation about 56 days); spotted hyena about 110 days, striped hyena about 90 days; African elephant about 22 months (the longest of any living mammal); macaques about 5.5 months. None reaches three years.
- Verdict based on modern science
- False. Wrong by a factor of 5–17 for every animal except the elephant (wrong by about 40%). Lewysohn is right, and his source (Aristotle) is the likely origin.
5 Livestock: 5, 9 and 12 months True
Bekhorot 8a:13 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
בהמה דקה טהורה לחמשה חדשים וכנגדן באילן גפן בהמה גסה טמאה לשנים עשר חודש וכנגדו באילן דקל טהורה לתשעה חדשים וכנגדה באילן זית הזאב והארי והדוב והנמר והברדלס והפיל והקוף והקיפוף לשלש שנים וכנגדן באילן בנות שוח
Small kosher livestock, such as sheep or goats, give birth after five months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the grapevine. Large non-kosher livestock, such as camels or donkeys, give birth after twelve months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the date palm. Large kosher livestock, such as cows, give birth after nine months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the olive. The wolf, and the lion, and the bear, and the leopard, and the bardelas, and the elephant, and the monkey, and the long-tailed ape give birth after three years, and corresponding to them with regard to trees is the white fig.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Small kosher livestock (sheep, goats) give birth after 5 months; large kosher livestock (cattle) after 9 months; large non-kosher livestock (donkey, camel, horse) after 12 months.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · § 17 (p. 11): correct for domestic animals whose mating is watched; agrees with Aristotle (sheep and goat 5 months, mare 11–12 months). But he says the 12-month rule "cannot apply to the camel", which Aristotle says carries five months.
- Current zoology
- Sheep about 147 days and goat about 150 days (= 5 months). Cattle about 283 days (= 9.3 months). Horse about 340 days (11 months), donkey about 365–375 days (12 months), dromedary camel about 375–390 days (12–13 months).
- Verdict based on modern science
- True. Good observational data for herd animals. Here the Talmud is right and Lewysohn's objection is wrong: the camel does carry about 12–13 months; Aristotle's 5 months is the error.
6 No upper front teeth = ruminant with cloven hooves True (within livestock)
Chullin 59a:8–11 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
גמ׳ תנו רבנן אלו הן סימני בהמה כל בהמה מפרסת פרסה וגו׳ כל בהמה שמעלת גרה בידוע שאין לה שינים למעלה וטהורה וכללא הוא והרי גמל דמעלה גרה הוא ואין לו שינים למעלה וטמא גמל ניבי אית ליה והרי בן גמל דניבי נמי לית ליה ותו הרי שפן וארנבת דמעלת גרה הן ויש להן שינים למעלה וטמאין ועוד שינים מי כתיבי באורייתא אלא הכי קאמר כל בהמה שאין לה שינים למעלה בידוע שהיא מעלת גרה ומפרסת פרסה וטהורה וליבדוק בפרסותיה כגון שהיו פרסותיה חתוכות וכדרב חסדא דאמר רב חסדא היה מהלך במדבר ומצא בהמה שפרסותיה חתוכות בודק בפיה אם אין לה שינים למעלה בידוע שהיא טהורה אם לאו בידוע שהיא טמאה ובלבד שיכיר גמל גמל ניבי אית ליה אלא ובלבד שיכיר בן גמל
GEMARA: The mishna states that the signs of a kosher domesticated animal are stated in the Torah. With regard to this, the Sages taught in a baraita: These are the signs of a kosher domesticated animal: “Whatsoever parts the hoof, and is wholly cloven-footed, and chews the cud, among the animals, that may you eat” (Leviticus 11:3). Any animal that chews the cud certainly has no upper front teeth, i.e., incisors, and is kosher. The Gemara asks: And is this an established principle? But isn’t there a camel, which chews the cud, and has no upper front teeth, and it is still non-kosher (see Leviticus 11:4)? The Gemara responds: A camel has cuspid-like upper incisors, one on each side. The Gemara asks: But isn’t there a young camel, which does not even have cuspid-like upper incisors and is still non-kosher? And furthermore, aren’t there the hyrax and the hare, which chew the cud, and yet they have upper front teeth, and are non-kosher? And furthermore, one might ask: Are teeth written in the Torah with regard to the kosher status of an animal? Rather, this is what the tanna is saying: Any animal that does not have upper front teeth certainly chews the cud and parts the hoof and is kosher. The Gemara asks: But why should one inspect the teeth? Let him simply inspect whether the hooves are cloven. The Gemara responds: One inspects the teeth in a case where its hooves were cut and one cannot tell whether they are cloven. And this is in accordance with the statement of Rav Ḥisda, as Rav Ḥisda says: If one was walking in the wilderness, and he found an animal whose hooves were cut, he may inspect its mouth. If it has no upper front teeth, it is certainly kosher; if that is not the case, it is certainly non-kosher, provided that he recognizes that this animal is not a camel, which is non-kosher even though it has no upper incisors. The Gemara asks: Why must one recognize that this is not a camel? A camel has cuspid-like upper incisors. Rather, say: Provided that one recognizes that it is not a young camel, which has no cuspid-like upper incisors.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Any animal that chews the cud has no upper front teeth; and any animal without upper front teeth chews the cud and has cloven hooves (so Rav Hisda can check a hoof-less carcass by its mouth). The exception is the camel, which has canine-like upper teeth (and the young camel, which does not have them yet).
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 58 · § 58 (p. 35) and § 163 (p. 135): repeats the rule and the camel exception; explains the camel's "teeth" as dental papillae or gums (Rashi).
- Current zoology
- Correct for the domain the Talmud means (hoofed livestock). All living true ruminants (suborder Ruminantia: cattle, sheep, goats, deer, antelopes, giraffes) have no upper incisors; a horny dental pad replaces them. Camelids (Tylopoda) chew the cud but are not true ruminants; adults keep one pair of upper incisors (I3), which are cone-shaped and canine-like, plus true upper canines. So the camel exception is anatomically exact. The 'young camel' point is weaker: dental surveys give deciduous upper incisors that erupt within the first weeks or months. Outside livestock the rule fails (sloths, anteaters, pangolins and baleen whales also lack upper incisors), but the Talmud limits it to behema.
- Verdict based on modern science
- True (within livestock). A sound diagnostic rule, and the camel exception is a real anatomical observation. The young-camel detail is doubtful.
7 Hare (and hyrax) chew the cud Partly true
Chullin 59a:10 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
והרי בן גמל דניבי נמי לית ליה ותו הרי שפן וארנבת דמעלת גרה הן ויש להן שינים למעלה וטמאין ועוד שינים מי כתיבי באורייתא אלא הכי קאמר כל בהמה שאין לה שינים למעלה בידוע שהיא מעלת גרה ומפרסת פרסה וטהורה
The Gemara asks: But isn’t there a young camel, which does not even have cuspid-like upper incisors and is still non-kosher? And furthermore, aren’t there the hyrax and the hare, which chew the cud, and yet they have upper front teeth, and are non-kosher? And furthermore, one might ask: Are teeth written in the Torah with regard to the kosher status of an animal? Rather, this is what the tanna is saying: Any animal that does not have upper front teeth certainly chews the cud and parts the hoof and is kosher.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The hyrax (shafan) and the hare (arnevet) chew the cud, yet have upper front teeth.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 141 · §§ 141–142 (pp. 109–111): the hare has upper teeth (true) and "rumination in hares undoubtedly takes place"; rejects Buffon's doubt.
- Current zoology
- Upper teeth: true. Hares and rabbits have two pairs of upper incisors (the second, small 'peg teeth' behind the first), which is why they are called Lagomorpha, not rodents. Cud-chewing: false in the technical sense. Lagomorphs are hindgut fermenters with one simple stomach. They practise caecotrophy: they eat soft faecal pellets (caecotropes) from the anus, mostly at night. This is sometimes called 'pseudo-rumination', but no food is regurgitated. Hyraxes also do not regurgitate; their jaw movement while resting looks like chewing.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Partly true. Upper teeth: correct. Rumination: not in the modern sense; caecotrophy is a functional analogue. Lewysohn (and Buffon's critics) were wrong.
8 Male hyena becomes a bat after 7 years False
Bava Kamma 16a:22 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
דתניא צבוע זכר לאחר שבע שנים נעשה עטלף עטלף לאחר שבע שנים נעשה ערפד ערפד לאחר שבע שנים נעשה קימוש קימוש לאחר שבע שנים נעשה חוח חוח לאחר שבע שנים נעשה שד שדרו של אדם לאחר שבע שנים נעשה נחש והני מילי דלא כרע במודים
And it is apparent that a male hyena is distinct from a female one, as it is taught in a baraita: A male hyena after seven years metamorphoses into an insectivorous bat [atalef ]; an insectivorous bat after seven years metamorphoses into a herbivorous bat [arpad]; a herbivorous bat after seven years metamorphoses into a thistle [kimosh]; a thistle after seven years metamorphoses into a briar [ḥo’aḥ]; and a briar after seven years metamorphoses into a demon. Similarly, a person’s spine, seven years after his death, metamorphoses into a snake. The Gemara qualifies the last statement: And this matter applies only to a case where that person did not bow during the blessing of thanksgiving, the eighteenth blessing of the Amida prayer.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- A male hyena after seven years becomes an atalef (bat); the bat after seven years an arpad; then a thistle, a briar, and finally a demon.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 119 · § 119 (pp. 76–77): a "fable" from the ancient belief that the hyena changes its sex (Pliny, Aelian; Aristotle denied it). He reads it as an ethical allegory. He explains the belief by Aristotle's note on a pouch under the tail that looks like a vulva.
- Current zoology
- False. Hyenas do not change sex or species. All four species (spotted, striped, brown hyena, aardwolf) are gonochoristic: each animal is male or female for life. The sex-change myth has two real sources: the female spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) has a pseudo-penis and pseudo-scrotum, so the sexes look alike; and the striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena, the species of the Levant and Mesopotamia) has a large anal (subcaudal) scent pouch that it everts, which is what Aristotle described. Bats, plants and hyenas are of course separate lineages.
- Verdict based on modern science
- False. Folklore. Lewysohn's explanation, after Aristotle, matches the modern explanation of the striped hyena's anal pouch.
9 The ishut (mole) has no eyes True
Moed Katan 6b:14 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
גמ׳ מאי אישות אמר רב יהודה בריה שאין לה עינים אמר רבא בר ישמעאל ואיתימא רב יימר בר שלמיא מאי קרא כמו שבלול תמס יהלך נפל אשת בל חזו שמש
GEMARA: The Gemara asks: What is meant by the term ishut? Rav Yehuda said: An ishut is a creature that has no eyes, a rodent that digs holes in the ground and can cause damage to roots and vegetables. Rava bar Yishmael said, and some say that it was Rav Yeimar bar Shelamya who said: What is the verse that indicates the identity of the ishut? “As a snail that melts and disappears; like the fall of a young mole [eshet] that has not seen the sun” (Psalms 58:9). It is understood that this creature has not seen the sun because it does not have eyes.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Rav Yehuda: the ishut, a field pest that people may trap on the intermediate festival days, is "a creature that has no eyes" (with Psalm 58:9, "has not seen the sun").
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 135 · § 135 (pp. 101–102): the Syrian mole, which has no visible eyes; Aristotle found imperfect eyes under the skin. He separates it from the European mole.
- Current zoology
- True for the animal of the region. The Middle Eastern blind mole-rat (Spalax / Nannospalax ehrenbergi complex, a rodent, not a true mole) has tiny eyes (under 1 mm) completely covered by skin and fur, with no external opening. It is behaviourally blind: no image vision. The buried eye still senses light and sets the circadian and seasonal rhythm. It is exactly the root- and tuber-eating field pest the Mishnah describes. (True moles, Talpidae, do not live in Israel; European moles have small but visible, functional eyes.)
- Verdict based on modern science
- True. A good field observation. Aristotle's 'eyes under the skin' (followed by Lewysohn) is also correct.
10 Telling mule from hinny Mostly false
Chullin 79a:11 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
והא אלא מינה קתני הכי קאמר אין מרביעין עליה לא מין סוס ולא מין חמור לפי שאין יודעין במינה וליבדוק בסימנין דאמר אביי עבי קליה בר חמרא צניף קליה בר סוסיא ואמר רב פפא רברבן אודניה וזוטרא גנובתיה בר חמרא זוטרן אודניה ורבה גנובתיה בר סוסיא הכא במאי עסקינן באלמת וגידמת
The Gemara challenges: But the baraita teaches: Rather, one mates her with one of her kind, indicating that her species is known. The Gemara explains that this is what the baraita is saying: One may not mate the species of a horse or the species of a donkey with her, because one does not usually know the species of the mother of a mule that one encounters. The Gemara suggests: But let one check her species by her distinguishing characteristics, as Abaye says: If its voice is deep, it is the offspring of a female donkey; if its voice is shrill, it is the offspring of a female horse. And Rav Pappa says: If its ears are large and its tail is small, it is the offspring of a female donkey; if its ears are small and its tail is large, it is the offspring of a female horse. The Gemara answers: Here we are dealing with a mule who is mute, and whose ears and tail are lopped off, and whose species cannot be determined. Therefore, Rabbi Yehuda’s opinion cannot be proven from this case.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Abaye: a deep voice means the dam was a donkey (= hinny); a shrill voice means the dam was a mare (= mule). Rav Pappa: large ears and a small tail mean a donkey dam (hinny); small ears and a large tail mean a mare dam (mule).
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 168 · § 168 (p. 144): repeats it without comment: the hinny has "a coarser voice, longer ears and a shorter tail".
- Current zoology
- Mostly the reverse of current descriptions. Breed societies and equine charities say the hinny (horse sire, donkey dam) usually has shorter ears and a more horse-like head, and the mule (donkey sire, mare dam) longer, donkey-like ears; that is, ear length follows the sire more than the dam. Tail descriptions disagree between sources. Voice is not a reliable sign: both usually bray, often with a whinny mixed in. Experts also say appearance alone cannot identify a mule or hinny with confidence; only pedigree or DNA can. The Gemara itself notes cases (a mute animal with docked ears and tail) where the signs fail.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Mostly false. The ear sign is inverted against modern descriptions; the voice and tail signs are unreliable. Evidence is descriptive (breeders, sanctuaries), not controlled study, so rate with care.
11 Hen: 21 days True
Bekhorot 8a:12 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן תרנגולת לעשרים ואחד יום וכנגדה באילן לוז כלב לחמשים יום וכנגדו באילן תאינה חתול לחמשים ושנים יום וכנגדו באילן תות חזיר לששים יום כנגדו באילן תפוח שועל וכל מיני שרצים ששה חדשים וכנגדם באילן תבואה
§ The Gemara cites a baraita that discusses the length of gestation for various animals. The Sages taught that a chicken hatches after twenty-one days, and corresponding to it in length of gestation with regard to trees is the almond, which ripens twenty-one days after the budding of the flower. A dog gives birth after fifty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the fig. A cat gives birth after fifty-two days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the mulberry. A pig gives birth after sixty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the apple. A fox and all types of creeping animals give birth after six months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees, i.e., plants, is grain.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The hen (gives birth) at 21 days.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · § 17 (pp. 9–10): rejects Rashi (21 days of egg formation inside the hen); the Talmud means the hatching of the chicks on the 20th or 21st day. He says the egg itself is mostly formed within 10 days (Aristotle).
- Current zoology
- Chicken eggs hatch after 21 days of incubation (range about 20–22 days, with temperature). Rashi's reading is wrong: the egg passes through the oviduct in about 24–26 hours; before that the yolk grows in the ovary for about 7–10 days, which matches Lewysohn's (Aristotle's) '10 days'.
- Verdict based on modern science
- True. Exact for incubation. Lewysohn's reading is the right one.
12 Fox and "all sheratzim": 6 months False
Bekhorot 8a:12 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן תרנגולת לעשרים ואחד יום וכנגדה באילן לוז כלב לחמשים יום וכנגדו באילן תאינה חתול לחמשים ושנים יום וכנגדו באילן תות חזיר לששים יום כנגדו באילן תפוח שועל וכל מיני שרצים ששה חדשים וכנגדם באילן תבואה
§ The Gemara cites a baraita that discusses the length of gestation for various animals. The Sages taught that a chicken hatches after twenty-one days, and corresponding to it in length of gestation with regard to trees is the almond, which ripens twenty-one days after the budding of the flower. A dog gives birth after fifty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the fig. A cat gives birth after fifty-two days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the mulberry. A pig gives birth after sixty days, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the apple. A fox and all types of creeping animals give birth after six months, and corresponding to them with regard to trees, i.e., plants, is grain.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The fox and all kinds of sheratzim (small creatures) give birth after six months.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 120 · §§ 17, 120 (pp. 10, 78): repeats it; takes sheratzim here as small predators (weasel, marten).
- Current zoology
- Red fox gestation is about 52 days (49–58), not 6 months. For Lewysohn's weasel group the answer is mixed: the least weasel carries about 35 days, but the stoat has delayed implantation, so the time from mating to birth is up to about 9–11 months (active fetal growth 3–4 weeks); martens also have delayed implantation. No species fits 6 months as a rule.
- Verdict based on modern science
- False. Wrong by more than 3 times for the fox. Lewysohn missed it.
13 Snake 7 years, viper 70 years False
Bekhorot 8a:14 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
אפעה לשבעים שנה וכנגדו באילן חרוב חרוב זה משעת נטיעתו עד שעת גמר פירותיו שבעים שנה וימי עיבורו שלש שנים נחש לשבע שנים ולאותו רשע לא מצינו חבר ויש אומרים מוכססים
The baraita continues: A viper gives birth after seventy years, and corresponding to it with regard to trees is the carob. In the case of this carob, the period from the time of its planting until the time of the ripening of its fruit is seventy years, and the length of its gestation is three years. A snake is born after seven years, and for that wicked animal we have not found a counterpart among trees. And some say that mukhsasim are the equivalent, as they ripen after seven years.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The efeh (viper) gives birth after 70 years; the snake after 7 years.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 17 · § 17 (p. 10): among "the latter false ones"; traces them to Aristotle's errors and to lack of observation.
- Current zoology
- Egg-laying snakes incubate their eggs for about 1.5–3 months. Live-bearing vipers such as the adder carry about 4.5 months. In cold climates many female adders breed only every second or third year, but no snake has a gestation of years. Snakes reach maturity in about 2–5 years.
- Verdict based on modern science
- False. Not close. Lewysohn is right.
14 Mates by night, births by night (bat); by day (hen) Mostly false
Beitzah 7a:15 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
תנו רבנן כל שתשמישו ביום נולד ביום כל שתשמישו בלילה נולד בלילה כל שתשמישו בין ביום ובין בלילה נולד בין ביום ובין בלילה כל שתשמישו ביום נולד ביום זו תרנגולת כל שתשמישו בלילה נולד בלילה זו עטלף כל שתשמישו בין ביום ובין בלילה אדם וכל דדמי ליה
§ The Sages taught in a baraita: Any species whose intercourse occurs only in the hours of the day is born only by day; any species whose intercourse occurs only at night is born only by night; any species whose intercourse occurs either by day or by night is born either by day or by night. The Gemara elaborates: Any species whose intercourse occurs by day is born by day, this is referring to a chicken. Any species whose intercourse occurs by night is born by night, this is a bat. Any species whose intercourse occurs either by day or by night, this means a human being and all that are similar to him.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Any species that mates by day gives birth by day (the hen); any species that mates by night gives birth by night (the bat); a species that mates by day or night (man) gives birth by day or night.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 16 · §§ 16, 136 (pp. 9, 103): states it as a rule for nocturnal and diurnal animals; repeats it for the bat.
- Current zoology
- Hen: true. Hens lay in daylight, mostly in the morning. Bat: probably false. Bats give birth in the roost, where they spend the day; direct records (captive pipistrelles, big brown bats) put births in daytime. Many temperate bats also mate in autumn and winter roosts, partly by day, with sperm storage until spring. As a rule the link is false: the timing of birth does not follow the timing of mating. The mare, a day-active animal, foals at night in about 80% of cases.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Mostly false. Correct for the hen only. The bat example is probably the wrong way round.
15 Signs of a rabid dog Mostly true
Yoma 83b:18 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
מי שנשכו כלב שוטה וכו׳ תנו רבנן חמשה דברים נאמרו בכלב שוטה פיו פתוח ורירו נוטף ואזניו סרוחות וזנבו מונח על ירכותיו ומהלך בצידי דרכים ויש אומרים אף נובח ואין קולו נשמע ממאי הוי רב אמר נשים כשפניות משחקות בו ושמואל אמר רוח רעה שורה עליו
§ It was taught that in the case of one whom a mad dog bit, one does not feed him the lobe of its liver. The Gemara clarifies the concept of the mad dog. The Sages taught in a baraita: Five signs were said about a mad dog: Its mouth is always open; and its saliva drips; and its ears are floppy and do not stand up; and its tail rests on its legs; and it walks on the edges of roads. And some say it also barks and its voice is not heard. The Gemara asks: From where did the dog become mad? Rav said: Witches play with it and practice their magic on it, causing it to become mad. And Shmuel said: An evil spirit rests upon it.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Five signs of a mad dog: its mouth is open, its saliva drips, its ears droop, its tail rests on its thighs, it walks at the edges of roads. Some say it also barks with no sound heard.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 122 · §§ 38, 122 (pp. 24, 85): repeats all the signs; explains the open mouth by "swelling" of the mouth muscles.
- Current zoology
- Mostly correct for canine rabies. In 'dumb' (paralytic) rabies the jaw muscles are paralysed, so the jaw hangs open; paralysis of the throat stops swallowing, so saliva drips; paralysis of the larynx makes the bark hoarse or silent. Restless wandering is typical. Drooping ears and a tucked tail are general signs of a sick or fearful dog, not specific to rabies. Lewysohn's cause (swelling) is wrong: it is paralysis.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Mostly true. A good clinical description, especially the dropped jaw, drooling and silent bark.
16 Food stays in a dog's gut 3 days Mostly false
Shabbat 155b:11 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
דרש רבי יונה אפיתחא דבי נשיאה מאי דכתיב (יודע) צדיק דין דלים יודע הקדוש ברוך הוא בכלב שמזונותיו מועטין לפיכך שוהה אכילתו במעיו שלשה ימים כדתנן כמה תשהה אכילתו במעיו ויהא טמא בכלב שלשה ימים מעת לעת ובעופות ובדגים כדי שתפול לאור ותשרף
Returning to the discussion of feeding dogs, the Gemara cites additional statements on the topic. Rabbi Yona taught at the entrance to the house of the Nasi: What is the meaning of that which is written: “The righteous man takes knowledge of the cause of the poor” (Proverbs 29:7)? The Holy One, Blessed be He, knows that for a dog, its sustenance is scarce and they are not fed sufficiently. Therefore, its food remains in its intestines for three days so that the dog will be sustained by that food, as we learned in a mishna dealing with the halakhot of ritual impurity: After an animal eats flesh from a corpse, how long does its food remain in its intestines undigested and therefore ritually impure? In the case of a dog it is for three twenty-four hour periods, and for fowl and fish, who digest their food quickly, it is the equivalent of the time it takes for the flesh to fall into the fire and be consumed by the fire.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- God knows the dog's food is scarce, so its food stays in its intestines three days (with the Mishnah: food stays undigested in a dog three full days).
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 122 · § 122 (p. 83): repeats it, but cites "B. batra 8a"; the Sefaria text of Bava Batra 8a does not have it.
- Current zoology
- In healthy dogs the stomach empties in about 7–15 hours (capsule studies) and total gut transit is about 1–2.5 days. Undigested bone can stay longer. Three days is at or beyond the upper end, and food is not 'undigested' for that time.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Mostly false. Too long, but the right order of magnitude for the slowest dogs. Dogs do tolerate long gaps between meals, which may be the observation behind it.
17 The cat covers its excrement True
Eruvin 100b:29 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
אמר רבי יוחנן אילמלא לא ניתנה תורה היינו למידין צניעות מחתול וגזל מנמלה ועריות מיונה דרך ארץ מתרנגול שמפייס ואחר כך בועל
Similarly, Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Even if the Torah had not been given, we would nonetheless have learned modesty from the cat, which covers its excrement, and that stealing is objectionable from the ant, which does not take grain from another ant, and forbidden relations from the dove, which is faithful to its partner, and proper relations from the rooster, which first appeases the hen and then mates with it.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- We would learn modesty from the cat (which covers its excrement), honesty from the ant, fidelity from the dove, and courtship from the rooster.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 118 · §§ 118, 137 (pp. 75, 106): reports it; adds Pliny's reason: the cat hides the smell so that mice are not driven away.
- Current zoology
- True as behaviour. Domestic cats and their wild ancestor (Felis lybica) usually bury faeces near their home area. Far from home, at territory edges, they often leave them uncovered as scent marks. The reason is scent control, not modesty; Pliny's 'not to scare the mice' is not supported.
- Verdict based on modern science
- True. The behaviour is correct; the moral is the Talmud's own frame. (The ant, dove and rooster parts are left for the next batch.)
18 Goats lead; camel's short tail; ox's long tail Mostly true
Shabbat 77b:8 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
רבי זירא אשכח לרב יהודה דהוה קאי אפיתחא דבי חמוה וחזייה דהוה בדיחא דעתיה ואי בעי מיניה כל חללי עלמא הוה אמר ליה אמר ליה מאי טעמא עיזי מסגן ברישא והדר אימרי אמר ליה כברייתו של עולם דברישא חשוכא והדר נהורא מאי טעמא הני מכסיין והני מגליין הני דמכסינן מינייהו מכסיין והני דלא מכסינן מינייהו מגליין מאי טעמא גמלא זוטר גנובתיה משום דאכל כיסי מאי טעמא תורא אריכא גנובתיה משום דדייר באגמי ובעי לכרכושי בקי
On the topic of the nature of the world, the Gemara relates that Rabbi Zeira found Rav Yehuda, who was standing at the entrance of his father-in-law’s house, and observed that he was in an especially cheerful mood. And Rabbi Zeira understood that were he to ask Rabbi Yehuda about anything in the entire world, he would tell him the answer. He therefore posed questions to him on a variety of topics unrelated to halakha. He asked: Why do goats walk in front of the flock and then ewes follow? He said to him: It is just as it was in the creation of the world, which at first was dark and then light followed. Goats, which are typically black, precede the ewes, which are typically white. And he asked: Why are the genitals of these ewes covered with a tail, whereas these goats are exposed? He answered: These ewes, whose wool we use to cover ourselves, are rewarded in that they are covered; and those goats, whose hair we do not use to cover ourselves, are exposed. And he asked: Why is the camel’s tail short? He answered: Because a camel eats thorns, and a long tail would become entangled in the thorns. And he asked: Why is the ox’s tail long? He answered: Because the ox lives in a swamp and must fend off mosquitoes.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Goats walk at the head of the flock and the ewes follow. The camel's tail is short because it eats thorns. The ox's tail is long because it lives in marshes and must drive away gnats.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 52 · §§ 52, 155, 160 (pp. 32, 124, 130): repeats all three; gives the goats' lead to their courage.
- Current zoology
- Goats leading: true. In mixed flocks goats are bolder and more exploratory, and shepherds use them as leaders. Ox tail: true as a function. Cattle use tail switching as their main defence against biting flies. Camel tail: the tail is fairly short (about 50 cm) and the camel does browse on thorny shrubs, but 'so that it does not catch in thorns' is an untested just-so explanation.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Mostly true. Observations correct; the camel reason cannot be tested.
19 The hen's lower eyelid closes upward True
Shabbat 77b:9 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
מאי טעמא קרנא דקמצא רכיכא משום דדיירא בחילפי ואי קשיא נדיא ומתעוורא דאמר שמואל האי מאן דבעי דליסמיה לקמצא שלופינהו לקרניה מאי טעמא האי תימרא דתרנגולתא מדלי לעילא דדיירי אדפי ואי עייל קטרא מתעוורא דשא דרך שם דרגא דרך גג מתכוליתא מתי תכלה דא ביתא בא ואיתיב בה ביקתא בי עקתא
He continued to ask: Why is the grasshopper’s antenna soft? He answered: Because it lives in the plains among the grass, and if the antenna were hard it would break and the grasshopper would go blind. When the grasshopper loses its antenna it is unable to move, as Shmuel said: One who seeks to blind a grasshopper should remove its antenna. And he asked: Why does the chicken’s lower eyelid cover the upper one? He answered: Because a chicken lives on rafters in houses, and if the smoke from the houses were to enter its eyes without the protection of the eyelid, it would go blind. He asked further: Why is a door called dasha in Aramaic? He said to him: It is an acronym for derekh sham, which means through there. Why is a stair called darga? He said to him: It is an acronym for derekh gag, which means the way to the roof. Why are spices called mitkolita? He said to him: It is an acronym for matai tikhleh da, which means when will this be finished. Since spices are used sparingly, they last a long time. Why is a house called beita? He said to him: It is an acronym for bo ve’eitiv ba, which means come and I will sit in it. Why is a small house called bikta? He said to him: It is an acronym for bei akta, which means a narrow house.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- The hen's lower eyelid rises over the upper one, because it lives on rafters and smoke would otherwise blind it.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 46 · §§ 46, 79 (pp. 29, 47): repeats it and widens it to "all heavy land birds".
- Current zoology
- True. In chickens and most birds the lower eyelid is the larger, more mobile one and closes the eye by moving up (owls are an exception). Birds also have a nictitating membrane that sweeps across the eye. The smoke reason is a just-so explanation; the trait is general to birds.
- Verdict based on modern science
- True. Anatomy correct. Lewysohn's wider rule is closer to the truth than the Talmud's (it is not limited to heavy birds either).
20 Fish, snake and pig get stronger with age Partly true
Shabbat 77b:11 on Bekiut · text on Sefaria
לבושה לא בושה גלימא שנעשה בו כגלם גולתא גלי ואיתיב פוריא שפרין ורבין עליה בור זינקא בור זה נקי סודרא סוד ה׳ ליראיו אפדנא אפיתחא דין תנו רבנן שלשה כל זמן שמזקינין מוסיפין גבורה ואלו הן דג ונחש וחזיר:
An outer garment is called levusha, which is an acronym for lo busha, which means no shame, as one who is clothed is no longer ashamed. A broad outer garment is called gelima, an allusion to the fact that, by wearing it, one is transformed into an amorphous golem-like figure, as his limbs are indistinguishable. A beautiful coat is termed golta, which is an acronym for geli ve’eitiv, which means reveal, remove the coat, and only then I will sit, so that the coat will not get dirty. A bed is called purya, an allusion to the fact that people parin veravin, which means procreate, upon it. An empty pit is called bor zinka, which is an acronym for bor ze naki, which means that this pit is empty of water. The head covering of Torah scholars is called sudara, an acronym for sod yareh, which is a reference to the verse: “The counsel of the Lord is with them who fear Him [sod Hashem lire’av]” (Psalms 25:14). A palace is called apadna, which is an acronym for apitḥa dein, meaning: To this entrance all come. The Gemara cites an additional baraita related to the nature of the creatures. There are three creatures that grow mightier with age, and they are the fish, and the snake, and the pig.
William Davidson edition
- Talmud claim
- Three creatures gain strength as they grow old: the fish, the snake and the pig.
- Lewysohn (1858)
- § 41 · §§ 41, 170 (pp. 26, 147): repeats it; adds (Avodah Zarah 30b) that old snakes have weaker venom.
- Current zoology
- Fish and snakes: largely true. Both have indeterminate growth: they keep growing after maturity, so old individuals are larger and, in fish, much more fertile (big old females produce far more eggs). Some fish species show almost no ageing. Pig: partly true. Pigs keep gaining weight for several years, and a boar's tusks grow all its life, so an old boar is more dangerous. But pigs do age and decline; they do not have indeterminate growth.
- Verdict based on modern science
- Partly true. A real biological pattern for fish and snakes; less so for the pig.
Sources for the modern data
- Cat gestation (mean about 65 days, range 52–74): review, PMC7103129; UK pedigree survey of 1,056 litters, PMC10832861; questionnaire of 197 queens, Utrecht research portal; research colony, PubMed 8542362.
- Dromedary gestation (about 12–13 months): IVIS, Theriogenology in Camelidae: Parturition; Vet. Med. Mosul review.
- Camel dentition (upper incisors I3 caniniform; deciduous incisors): Assiut University, dentition of the dromedary; PMC10472607.
- Lagomorph caecotrophy versus rumination: cuniculture.info, Biology of the rabbit, ch. 4; Journal of Zoology, digestive strategies in two lagomorphs.
- Blind mole-rat eye and circadian photoreception: PMC61113 (Avivi et al. 2001, PNAS); Haifa, spectral tuning of a circadian photopigment in Spalax; Haifa, reduced eye size and photoperiodic system.
- Mule versus hinny: Wikipedia, Hinny; Rural Heritage, Mule or Hinny?; Redwings, a-mule-zing differences (PDF); The Donkey Sanctuary Canada FAQ.
- Dog gastric emptying and gut transit: PMC3390132; Petfood Industry, body weight and GI transit times in dogs.
- Bat birth timing: PMC11499213 (northern bats); Pagepress, captive Pipistrellus births; Pixcams, big brown bat births.
- Mares foal at night (about 80%): equine-behaviour.de reference 984; Univ. Bern, Theriogenology 2022 (PDF).
- Gestation tables (wolf 63 d, lion about 108 d, fox 52 d, and others): MSD Veterinary Manual, approximate gestation periods.
- Pig gestation: Cambridge, Large White pedigree herd (mean 114.17 d); DOAJ, commercial crossbred sows (mean 117.6 d).
- Brown bear delayed implantation and gestation: PMC4079694. Elephant 22 months: National Geographic.
- Stoat delayed implantation: YPTE stoat factsheet; Bioscience Proceedings, captive stoats.
- Adder gestation and biennial breeding: PMC6511386 (PeerJ 2019); Journal of Herpetology, annual reproduction in montane adders.
- Paralytic rabies in dogs (dropped jaw, salivation, voice change): MSD Animal Health rabies info (PDF); JIDC 2024 case report.
- Bird eyelids (lower lid closes the eye; owls the exception): BMC Veterinary Research 2025; SciELO, avian ophthalmic peculiarities.
- Not yet sourced one by one (standard reference values): hen incubation, leopard, hyena and macaque gestation, sheep/goat/cattle/horse/donkey gestation, oviparous snake incubation, bat and lagomorph anatomy, hyena pseudo-penis and anal pouch, cat latrine behaviour, cattle tail-switching, goats leading flocks, and indeterminate growth in fish and snakes.